https://t.co/Y642X6jkvU

— il Donaldo Trumpo (@PapiTrumpo) October 28, 2026

We’re learning more about the 16-year-old who opened fire at a school in Bend, Oregon earlier this month, killing three children and a teacher before an armed Good Samaritan intervened and stopped the attack.

Now, as more of the shooter’s history comes to light, one of the newest details is absolutely staggering:

Between March 2020 and October 2026, 911 dispatch received 52 calls for service associated with his family’s home.

52 calls in just over six years.

According to Deschutes County 911 dispatch records obtained by local news, those calls included a runaway juvenile, suicidal subject, domestic dispute, welfare checks, among others. The records don’t establish that the shooter himself was involved in every one of those calls.

But 52 calls associated with one household is an extraordinary amount of contact with the system.

Local news also found that his mother had 37 documented encounters with Bend Police dating back to 2013.

And that adds to what we already knew about the years leading up to the shooting.

As a child, the shooter had been placed in a specialized program for students with significant behavioral and social challenges. Investigators are also looking into his possible connections to violent online extremist groups.

Then, just two months before the shooting, his mother bought a shotgun and gave it to him for his 16th birthday. That was the gun he ultimately used in the attack.

At some point, we have to ask where the accountability lands.

Because after something horrific like this happens, the conversation almost immediately turns to another gun law. Another restriction. Another tool the government supposedly needs to prevent the next one.

But what about the tools and systems already in place?

How do you get to 52 calls to one home in six years and still end up here? No gun law fixes that. Especially in Oregon, where they have so many gun laws that even the armed Good Samaritan who stopped the shooter had to break the law to end the attack.

This is a systemic failure and an accountability problem.

We see these failures again and again, but rarely any accountability for how they happened or what needs to change to prevent the next one.

Before we start talking about what new laws millions of gun owners need to follow, I want to know where the existing system failed.

— Rally For Our Rights (@RallyRights) October 27, 2026

Oh man. Lula is so screwed 🤣.

Like, I’m not genius at reading tea leaves, but Lula is 100% screwed. 🤣🤣🤣

You wanna know how you can tell patriots are in control?

Because Flavio got out of Brazil.

“Shall we play a game”?

Enjoy the show.

— Paul Fleuret (@RealAbs1776) October 27, 2026

Potential midterm scenario:

Trump already gave the DOJ orders to focus on and prosecute election/voter fraud.

Let’s assume deep blue counties/states commit election fraud like they normally do, essentially daring Trump to hold them accountable, then when the Trump administration step in and actually hold them accountable for once, then they cry that Trump is interfering in the outcome of the election.

It’s no secret that the Dems/MSM have been eager to establish the narrative that Trump is going to interfere in the election somehow. I don’t think that’s based on nothing. They know something. They are preparing for something.

I’m not exactly sure what’s going to happen, but I expect shenanigans on election night, and the days after.

— Clandestine (@WarClandestine) October 28, 2026

The sanctimonious image of James Comey and Jack Smith as fearless guardians of American justice is taking one hell of a beating from an especially inconvenient source: their own government’s records.

Comey now faces two federal charges over an alleged classified leak to The New York Times. An FBI investigative record from 2020 documented that James Baker believed authorization to disclose the information came directly from Comey through FBI Chief of Staff James Rybicki.

The FBI had traced the alleged authorization to its own director. Prosecutors declined to bring charges.

Quite the magnificent display of accountability from the people who spent years lecturing America about the rule of law.

And Jack Smith? His supposedly pristine investigative operation produced internal emails documenting at least SIX occasions when potentially privileged material improperly reached investigators. His office had to retrieve sensitive documents, purge files from FBI systems, and confront questions about preserving emails.

Then Smith assured Congress that his operation followed Justice Department policies and legal requirements.

What an embarrassing bureaucratic shitshow.

These were men entrusted with extraordinary investigative power over Donald Trump. They demanded public confidence in their judgment, deference to their authority, and unquestioning respect for the institutions they represented.

Now the documentary record is exposing uncomfortable questions about their own conduct, and the contrast is absolutely brutal.

The same federal establishment that treated every procedural controversy surrounding Trump as a five-alarm constitutional emergency now has some explaining to do about its own handling of classified information, attorney-client privilege, and sworn testimony.

The hypocrisy practically screams off the page.

Strip away the self-righteous speeches, the carefully polished reputations, and the insufferable sermons about nobody being above the law.

What’s left are criminal charges against Comey, documented investigative failures inside Smith’s office, and serious questions demanding answers.

Their reputations are no substitute for accountability.

Their former titles confer no immunity from scrutiny.

And their years of preaching about the rule of law have earned them precisely zero exemptions from it. (article below)

— Flopping Aces (@FloppingAces) October 27, 2026