Search results
561 articles found
matching your search request
remember
-
FISA GOES BOTH WAYS.
Brian is making a really important point here.
I predicted a long time ago, that Comey would be the first “big indictment.”
It just happened.
This newly “unsealed indictment” isn’t about Comey’s leak AFTER he was fired, to frame Trump for “obstruction of justice” and set up the call for a Special Counsel investigation.
This “unsealed indictment” involves a “whistleblower,” who has flipped and exposed the fact that Comey was part of the “protection racket” for Obama and Hillary.
And as part of that “protection racket,” he was ALREADY SPYING and LEAKING classified information to shape the media narrative against Obama and Hillary’s opponents.What a lot of people don’t understand fully, is that the Obama administration was spying on all their political opponents, long before they ever applied for a FISA warrant against Carter Page to spy on the Trump campaign.
A large group of Obama administration officials were illegally accessing the NSA database until they were caught by Admiral Rogers.
Admiral Rogers shut down their access and reported the spying campaign to the FISA court.
That caused immediate panic in the Obama administration.Obama needed a quick plan to obtain a FISA warrant and they had no other option, than to use the Steele dossier provided by Hillary.
None of it was true and they knew it, but they had no other option.
They “knowingly” hid the fact that it was all unverified from the FISA court.Why would the Obama administration use the Steele dossier as evidence, “knowing” it would be easily debunked?
They were PANICKED and had no other option.
The Comey FISA application against Carter Page, wasn’t a fraudulent application to “start” spying on Trump and many others.
It was the “coverup” to the illegal Obama spying operation that had been happening throughout Obama’s presidency.
This new “unsealed indictment” against Comey, proves that this investigation is far bigger than lying to a FISA court.
And remember my other prediction:
After Comey’s “unsealed indictment,” comes an “unsealed indictment” for John Brennan.
They are leading directly to Obama’s sealed indictment because he personally gave the order to spy illegally, to both Comey and Brennan.
————-
Q drop
2959
Mar 04, 2019 3:39:34 PM ESTHussein GAVE THE ORDER to start the spy campaign.
It was logged officially 2x.
1x – Domestic. (Comey)
1x – Foreign. (Brennan)
FISC judge WH meeting?
WH visitor logs are important.
Hussein library CLAS doc move?
Attempt to shelter/protect?
Who has AUTH to obtain?
The More You Know.
Q
———-There is a paper trail of “evidence” that leads directly to Obama.
And don’t miss this important fact.
Five days after Admiral Rogers shut down Obama’s access to the NSA database, he reported the illegal access to the FISA court.
Why is that important?
FISA goes both ways.
A TRAP was set.
The “protection racket” in the FBI and DOJ were allowed to renew the Carter Page FISA warrant three more times, AFTER they were exposed for illegally spying.
Why would the FISA court allow the weaponized DOJ/FBI to continue to spy?
Sting operation.
The hunters had become the hunted.
And for those out there, who still don’t believe that AG Barr is a patriot.
Trump gave Barr authority over declassified information.Why?
———-
Q drop
3458
Jul 21, 2019 4:35:27 PM EDTIf AG Barr has access to all classified material, how does [MUELLER] navigate?
Barr ended the Mueller witch-hunt.— JoeLange (@JoeLange) October 27, 2026
If [MUELLER] provides FALSE and/or MISLEADING testimony, will AG Barr be forced to DECLAS all documentation to ensure full public awareness of the TRUTH?
If [MUELLER] defers to the original report but D’s/ FAKE NEWS push a false narrative ‘knowing majority of the public did not watch the actual hearing’ will AG Barr be forced to DECLAS all documentation to ensure full public awareness of the TRUTH?
[Be Ready], [MUELLER].
[Be Ready], [James Comey].
[Be Ready], [Traitors one & ALL].
Thank you for playing.
FISA GOES BOTH WAYS.
Q https://t.co/uBWvPgfCSm
——Posted ·
Categories Clips -
The democrats were warned but had no other option, than to massively cheat. Now they are TRAPPED as every state begins to be exposed “publicly.”
Are ALL the Q drops now coming full circle?
Remember my post on 11.3 (Nov 3 election) and what begins on 11.4 (actionable).
Q told us to trust Kansas.
Kansas just kicked off the first of many election audits required by DHS.
The democrats were warned but had no other option, than to massively cheat.
Now they are TRAPPED as every state begins to be exposed “publicly.”
A red wave was forming in the early vote totals.
That FORCED the democrats to go overboard “across the country” to steal the ENTIRE election, even in red states.
They needed to win both houses of Congress in a big way.
They needed a blue tsunami.But why did Trump allow them to steal the election again?
It’s more than just “trapping” them by exposing the FRAUD.
Here’s an important reason that I haven’t heard anybody mention yet.
Trump hasn’t mentioned FRAUD and is purposely acting subdued and willing to work with democrats.
Meanwhile, the democrats all over the country are celebrating and “dunking” on Trump and MAGA.It’s exactly what Trump wants.
If my prediction of a red wave would have materialized, a whole lot of enemy players would be fleeing the country because they ALL know what’s coming.
Instead, they think they are victorious and have just taken back control of the federal government.
None of them have fled.
Why is that important?
To make the “mass arrest” phase of the plan much easier.
There’s a reason the NG are still stationed in DC.
————
Q drop
34
Nov 01, 2017 10:56:16 PM EDTAnonymous
Q Clearance PatriotMy fellow Americans, over the course of the next several days you will undoubtedly realize that we are taking back our great country (the land of the free) from the evil tyrants that wish to do us harm and destroy the last remaining refuge of shining light. On POTUS’ order, we have initiated certain fail-safes that shall safeguard the public from the primary fallout which is slated to occur 11.3 upon the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta (actionable 11.4). Confirmation (to the public) of what is occurring will then be revealed and will not be openly accepted. Public riots are being organized in serious numbers in an effort to prevent the arrest and capture of more senior public officials. On POTUS’ order, a state of temporary military control will be actioned and special ops carried out. False leaks have been made to retain several within the confines of the United States to prevent extradition and special operator necessity. Rest assured, the safety and well-being of every man, woman, and child of this country is being exhausted in full. However, the atmosphere within the country will unfortunately be divided as so many have fallen for the corrupt and evil narrative that has long been broadcast. We will be initiating the Emergency Broadcast System (EMS) during this time in an effort to provide a direct message (avoiding the fake news) to all citizens.Organizations and/or people that wish to do us harm during this time will be met with swift fury – certain laws have been pre-lifted to provide our great military the necessary authority to handle and conduct these operations (at home and abroad).
———-This drop gives several “clues.”
Dated Nov 1.
“Over the course of the next several days you will undoubtedly realize that we are taking back our great country”
“we have initiated certain fail-safes that shall safeguard the public from the primary fallout which is slated to occur 11.3” (Nov 3 election)
What was slated to occur “if” the democrats lost the election?
Massive violent riots worse than the Summer of Love in 2020.
What’s the fail-safe safeguard that is “actionable on 11.4?”
PERMANENT election audits for every state begin in Kansas.
It will begin the “confirmation to the public” that our ENTIRE election system is FRAUDULENT.
The democrats falsely thinking they control the federal government again, is “to retain several within the confines of the United States to prevent extradition and special operator necessity.”— JoeLange (@JoeLange) November 5, 2026Posted ·
Categories Clips -
Government Officials Now Actually Admit They're Real
Here’s how I would do it.
We have established on another forum that I’m a bad person.
Not Evil, Just Bad. I think I also mentioned that my hobby
is world domination through psycho-eeeleeectronic methods.
While I can admire the equipment and methods Mr. Dice outlines below from a professional standpoint my hobbyist budget precludes me from utilizing such extravagant solutions.
So, how would I do it on the Cheap using the Keep it Simple principal?
I came across a patent many, many years ago for a method to manipulate frequencies a monitor produced to induce certain responses from subjects in proximity to those monitors.
As in a pulse of frequency of ‘X’ will produce general irritation in the subject.
A little different pulse might produce anxiety.
Maybe a pulse of frequency ‘Y produces fear.
And so on.
Cool. So I really don’t need all that subliminal stuff, those embedded messages in videos or any voice embedding technology – just a little duct tape, a bad attitude and I’m gonna MacGyver you up some Conditioning that would make Skinner blush.
Next I need to identify susceptible subjects – maybe via what news they watch, media they consume, websites visited, or games played. Pretty easy if you are one of the big guys – they just pull your profile, remember though I’m working on a budget and am going to have to get the information the way everyone else does – buy it from the big guys. Wining.
At this point we will have identified subjects favorable towards our conditioning – maybe they lean politically towards our goals or are more vulnerable emotionally to conditioning in general.
Now (finally) we connect the pulse (stimulus) that produces the response with a topic.
It goes like this: The subject is surfing the web minding their own business when they play a video, news clip, commentary, podcast and the video concerns the Topic of the day: ‘Trump’.
The site delivering the video identifies (knows) the viewer as a certain type and delivers the appropriate ‘pulse/stimulus’ during the presentation. This allows tailored stimulus down to the individual level.
The monitor is pulsed and the subject receives a stimulus of fear or anxiety directly into their brain (triggering an adrenaline rush? Don’t go there yet lol).
Let’s say on an average day the subject receives 20 news ‘pulses’.
Trump = Pulse X 20 × 365. Every Day.
Soon you have a group of people who just want the topic of ‘Trump’ to stop.
To just go away.
Don’t care how or why just make ‘Trump’ end.
The topic becomes intolerable.
Observation shows that when the stimulus is removed the subjects demonstrate astonishing indifference/disinterest in the outcome or any follow up to the topic for or against what was moments ago a strongly held opinion.
Subjects seem to go inert until the programming starts anew with a new target or topic.
To sum up -
While I think the technology Mr. Dice is talking about below is elegant and sophisticated and seriously appeals to the juvenile delinquent in me, realistically I’ll never get to play with it.
I do think however that with the general concepts I’ve presented above I can deliver a programming solution just as effective, with value added that is quickly re-targetable (re-programmable) with granularity from large groups down to individuals – providing for various levels of stimulus, producing a wide range of desired responses — for a tenth the cost of big players. ;-)
In all seriousness.
We are bags of protoplasm. Mostly water. And giant antennas.
Forget AI – we are vulnerable to lowly algorithms and the immense speed advantages that computers provide when your credit and a few other indicators are checked before a price for your next flight is quoted by unscrupulous corporations. ‘Roadkill on the internet highway.’
What I have outlined here is a crude tool (the pulse) that can be used in a fine tuned fashion by (only because of) the use of systems to provide organization/categorization/information processing and response.
We Are All Part Of The Feedback Loop Now.
Think what a corporation might do with unfettered access to your psychological profiles, an ability to manipulate your emotions to an extreme degree unknown to you and no morals or ethics at all in pursuit of profit and power.
You Are Being Programmed. All the Time. From Everywhere.
-
You Have More Than You Know.
‘You Have More Than You Know.’
Whoa Nelly! Another recurring phrase in those posts.
Ever had the experience of looking at an image, a picture many times over many years and of course over those years the image always looks the same. It’s an image right? Maybe a family photo, a historical image, or a framed photo of his family on the desk of a co-worker. And then one day you learn something. Might be a historical fact unknown to you, or something happens to someone in the photo, say that co-workers son gets sick. And from that day on the photo looks exactly the same – but way different?!
Information has added to our perspective and we adjust how we ‘read’ that information into how we view the world.
In effect we ‘see’ the abstract information acquired applied to our visual processing. We build the information in our minds with a new ‘bias’ or ‘perspective’. And the same picture never again looks the way it did.
For me it’s been that way with ‘those’ posts. I have a very good memory and having studied these posts over the last four years have pretty much memorized them the way you do when you have a favorite book you read many times. There are less then 5 thousand posts.
Look, I could have memorized all 10,000 Kardashian posts and seriously annoyed everybody.
I keep telling you I’m a bad person. Not evil. Just bad. Don’t judge me.
Not quite as good as those guys that have some books memorized by chapter and verse but a pretty close paraphrase, if you will. I think that has been of benefit in being able to interpret the posts against whats happening all around the world now. I’ve get that reference in my head, real-time.
Many analyze those posts against a religious sometimes prophetic (some as endtimes) perspective and the posts do tell us it’s going to be Biblical.
My background is systems, languages, symbols and I always viewed those posts as a sort of pseudo code, a logistical language, a description of the processes involved. When I read the first posts they just Looked to me like a high level language.
From that perspective I have been pondering recent events and processing them against all those posts I carry like a big ol database in my head…
So there I was, minding my own business and these two thoughts collide. Right in front of me. Could not avoid it to save my life. Shattered concepts all over the ground. And in the greatest ‘you got your peanut butter on my chocolate’ epiphany I’ve ever had I looked at the bulk of all that information rotated a few degrees askew, in just a slightly different perspective and began seeing relationships between things that from the trenches seem totally unrelated. But abstract several levels above and from that 100,000 foot view those relationships become clearer.
Abstraction. You have more than you know.
Hokey Smokes!
This is one of the most extraordinary events in history.
Watch it unfold without fear.
Enjoy the destruction of our overlords – all streamed for your enjoyment.
Those same posts say some of you are going to lose your minds when the data begins to drop on ‘Those you trust the most’. People. Corporations. Institutions. Foundations. Governments. All down to the local level.
Anons have an obligation to help these souls understand what is going on when things get Real Weird ™ Playing Very Soon.
So I will tell you things. I hope when the receipts start to drop – to show you those things too. It’s been a long time coming. In order for me to do this we have to have an agreement, a contract in effect on the context of these discussions.
Consider this my disclaimer:
You are sitting in an airport lounge. Not one of those lounges they let us riff raff into but one of those fancy lounges that you need to be a member of. Ones that have plastic cards for entrance in exotic, expensive colors like diamond, onyx, platinum, palladium, gold. Privileged colors.
So there you are at the bar for a three hour layover grateful the place is damn near empty. And the door opens to admit another member worthy of the grandeur that is a members only airport lounge.
You understand this individual has already made the first cut into this inner sanctum and only requires a brief look over. Careful, security minded traveler that you are.
Well dressed, hand tooled boots, expensive suit. Groomed well, around 60. Perfectly suited for the rarefied atmosphere that is the members only airport lounge.
Except for the hat. Not so much the hat, which also appears to be very well made – it was the embroidered patch on the front of the hat that was a little out of place. A little gouache. It was a very intricate, obviously expensive hand embroidered image of an ass. In any other place but an exclusive airport lounge of beautiful people it might have gone unnoticed. But here? And yet he has a piece of plastic in a precious color few others have.
Sure enough he sits down at the bar next to you. And begins to talk. Everything he says stands on it’s own. Sometimes it’s a stretch, but logical thinking prevails. It’s when he begins connecting the dots, points out relationships between things you have never thought of that you begin to understand the hat.
Individually everything the guy says makes sense.. It’s the connections that are so very hard to accept because if that connection is true – then this must be true… and the whole system comes down. No one wants to begin to think about the enormity of an entire system failing.
Over the course of the next days, weeks and months you remember what the guy said and are surprised he makes more sense – you begin to trust more what he said – then those ‘people you trust the most’.
You have begun your journey when you trust The AssHat’s information more than that creepy Max Headroom looking mofu on CNN.
I’ve created a ‘The AssHat’ category on retrograde and will be posting what The AssHat has to say there.
Keep in mind everything said under that category is uttered by a guy wearing a patch on his hat of a big hairy ass.
You have been warned.Posted ·
Categories The AssHat -
Hokey Smokes!
This is long but a necessary read for all Oregon voters, especially those who aren’t necessarily well versed or knowledgeable of Tina Kotek’s way of governing. She was and is a terrible, vindictive person but more so to her own party members. I was a witness to all former Rep. Diego Hernandez writes here. This is a Democrat telling the truth about former Speaker now Governor Kotek. I just wish more of my former colleagues would be so brave. He is an honorable man. #orpol #orleg #orgov I’m not voting for Tina Kotek. I personally know Tina Kotek’s Leadership. I Experienced It. I’ve been watching Tina Kotek’s governorship and the growing frustration with her leadership, the staff turnover, the controversies, and the struggles to deliver on some of Oregon’s most pressing issues. And I can’t help but reflect on my own experience. I served four years in the Oregon House of Representatives under Tina Kotek’s leadership as Speaker. I worked directly with her. I experienced how she treated people who challenged her authority, disagreed with her decisions, or refused to fall in line. I was bullied, harassed, threatened, and politically targeted by Tina Kotek. I don’t say that lightly. I lived it, documented it, provided evidence and witnesses, and eventually testified publicly about it. And what I experienced says a lot about the kind of leadership I believe Oregon has been subjected to. —When Power Becomes a Tool for Control— I still remember one of my first meetings with Tina when I was newly elected. There wasn’t much interest in getting to know me, understanding the communities I represented, or discussing the policies I wanted to champion. Instead, I was told how much money I was expected to raise for the Democratic caucus and how my ability to advance legislation, secure committee assignments, and receive political support would depend on meeting those expectations. That was my introduction to legislative leadership. Now, I understand politics. I understand fundraising, negotiating, coalition building, and the difficult compromises that come with governing. I’ve participated in all of it. But there’s a difference between exercising political leadership and using institutional power to intimidate, punish, and control people. Over time, I came to experience Tina’s leadership as rooted in fear, coercion, manipulation, and political retaliation. The message was clear: Support what she wants, or risk losing what matters to you. And when you represent communities that have historically been excluded from political power, that kind of leverage can be particularly harmful. —The Day She Threatened My Career— In 2019, Tina was trying to pass controversial legislation changing Oregon’s public employee retirement system, commonly known as PERS. I disagreed with the legislation and refused to vote for it. That decision led to repeated pressure and threats. And during one of her escalating confrontations towards me, Tina told me directly: “I will make sure to end your career.” She threatened my legislative priorities, my political future, and bills I had worked hard to advance. In one of her final attempts to get me to change my vote, she said she was going to kill the legislation to restore access to driver’s licenses for undocumented Oregonians if I voted no. Think about that for a moment. A policy affecting thousands of immigrant families, people who needed to drive legally to work, take their children to school, and participate in everyday life, was being used as leverage to force my vote on an entirely unrelated issue. I wasn’t going to let that happen. Immediately after that threat, I called Rep. Teresa Alonso Leon, who was working with me on the driver’s license legislation, and told her what Tina was threatening to do. Teresa was courages and she told Tina that if she killed our driver’s license bill, Teresa would change her vote on PERS from yes to a no. With the vote already extremely close, losing another vote completely threatened Tina’s ability to pass the legislation. That changed the political equation. The PERS bill barely passed, but only after Democrat changed their vote from no to yes. That legislator had been called into Tina’s office and, from what I witnessed, emerged in tears, visibly distressed by the vote they felt compelled to make. Our driver’s license legislation survived thanks to Teresa Alonso Leon and eventually became law. But I never forgot what it took to protect it. What disturbed me most was how easily the needs of an entire community could become bargaining chips in an effort to control another elected official. And this was only one example of what I experienced. —When the System Protects Power— I eventually filed a formal workplace harassment complaint and provided evidence of Tina’s conduct, including contemporaneous messages, witnesses, and documentation of the threats. Tina worked hard to make sure the investigation never concluded or to come out and see the light of day, dragging far beyond the required time required by statute. People witnessed parts of what happened. I told colleagues about the threats immediately after they occurred, long before there was any formal investigation. The investigator even concluded that the evidence more closely supported my version of events. Yet the investigator reasoned that conduct potentially inappropriate in another workplace was different in the Legislature because politics is inherently contentious. Mind you that investigator is under the office controlled by Tina herself. These investigators work like prosecutors for her office. Essentially, the intimidation I experienced was treated as part of politics. The House Conduct Committee ultimately deadlocked 2–2 over whether her conduct violated workplace rules. That vote distinction matters to me. A complaint being dismissed by deadlocked doesn’t mean she didn’t violate the rules, yet that’s what was reported. In my experience, the legislative accountability system was deeply compromised by her political influence, institutional self-protection, and what I witnessed as the targeting of people she considered political enemies. My experience left me with profound concerns about whether those holding the greatest power could ever be meaningfully held accountable by a process operating within the same institutional power structure they could influence and manipulate. These systems were weaponized by Kotek against political opponents, including me and other legislators who challenged her leadership or refused to do what she wanted. Those concerns extend beyond my own experience. She had the power to initiate any investigation she wanted, when she wanted under the mandatory reporting rules, Tina herself initiated investigations through reports she submitted herself, while the process could obscure who had set the investigation in motion. I witnessed first hand the political exploitation of that authority. When political power influences who gets investigated, who gets believed, how conduct is interpreted, and who faces consequences, accountability itself becomes vulnerable to manipulation. And as a man of color, I am especially aware of how racial stereotypes, historical inequities, and systemic racism can make it easier for someone to be targeted, labeled, and presumed culpable. And how much more the consequences that come with such targeting. And that should concern everyone, regardless of political affiliation. —The Long-Term Cost of Leading Through Fear— Here’s what my experience taught me about leadership. You can get a lot accomplished in the short term through intimidation, political threats, transactional relationships, control over fundraising, and and the enormous leverage that comes with controlling legislative assignments and influencing state budgets. People will comply. They will tell you what you want to hear. They may even defend you publicly because their careers, priorities, relationships, or access to resources depend on maintaining your favor. That can look like effective leadership from the outside. But over time, that style of leadership begins to rot the very foundation of her leadership and the institutions, relationships, and trust upon which leadership depends on. Trust deteriorates. People become afraid to disagree. Independent thinking gets punished. Genuine relationships become transactional. Loyalty becomes a measure of usefulness rather than shared values or mutual respect. Eventually, the consequences become harder to contain. Unlike leadership rooted in respect, consistent values and, like that of Morse, Hatfield, Dellenback, McCall, Katz, Paulus, McNary, Courtney, Roberts, Carter, and other Oregon’s great leaders. When I see the turmoil surrounding Tina’s governorship, the departure of senior staff, the controversies over her decision-making and the questions surrounding her wife’s involvement in state government and the use of public resources to support that role,, and the growing frustration over the state’s direction, I recognize aspects of the leadership culture I experienced. I do believe how someone exercises power has consequences, especially when they become responsible for leading an entire state. A governor needs people who feel empowered to speak honestly, challenge decisions, identify mistakes, and offer different perspectives without fearing retaliation. You cannot build that kind of environment through fear. —Oregon Deserves Better Leadership— Yes, Tina Kotek has worked hard on some policies that I support. We have shared political priorities, and there are legislative accomplishments during her time as Speaker that deserve recognition. I can acknowledge those accomplishments while also speaking honestly about how she leads and what I witnessed. Political alignment should never require us to excuse hostile leadership that uses bullying, harassment, manipulation, or abuses of power from people on our own side. I’ve spent 15 years of my life working in communities where leadership is rooted in relationships, collective responsibility, restoritve justice, and the understanding that people deserve dignity, including when we disagree. I’ve also seen how political systems can reproduce the same harmful power dynamics that many of us entered public service hoping to change. Leadership requires making difficult decisions. Sometimes people will disagree with you. Sometimes you’ll lose votes, face criticism, or have to make compromises that disappoint people. That comes with the responsibility of public service. But threatening someone’s livelihood, political future, or the communities they represent because they refuse to surrender their independent judgment should never be normalized as the cost of doing politics. I know how damaging that kind of leadership can be. I live with its consequences long after leaving the Legislature. And while other people may have had different experiences with Tina, this was mine. I believe Oregon deserves leadership that builds trust rather than fear, earns loyalty rather than demands obedience, welcomes disagreement rather than punishes it, and understands that political power is a public responsibility rather than a personal instrument of control. I didn’t enter public service to be loyal to a political leader. I entered it to represent people, advocate for communities, and advance policies that improve lives. And no elected official, regardless of their title, party, or political power, should ever have to choose between their conscience and their career. That’s the kind of political culture I believe we should be challenging, including within our own political circles. And that’s why, based on my own experience, I don’t believe Tina Kotek represents the kind of leadership Oregon deserves and won’t be voting for her because we do need change, we need great leaders like the names I mentioned earlier. -Diego (I wrote this myself and not a.i. so please excuse all my grammatical errors)
— Bill Post 🇺🇸 (@TheBillPost) October 23, 2026Posted ·
Categories Clips -
Epstein didn't kill himself. lol.
So Jean-Luc Brunel & Peter Nygard are in jail, Leon Black, Glenn Dubin & now Jes Staley have retired to spend more time with their lawyers, Prince Andrew is afraid to leave the UK…this is slightly encouraging, but many Epstein buddies still out there.
— Rudy Havenstein remembers. (@RudyHavenstein) November 1, 2021
One in particular… pic.twitter.com/lNGQ3SDP2pPosted ·
Categories Clips -
The actual plan:
Initially, I wanted to lose my mind when
elonmusk</a> mentioned removing blocking, but then I remembered he's a pretty smart guy (literal rocket science)<br><br>The actual plan:<br>1. 𝕏 WILL transfer all blocked accounts to 'Muted' accounts<br>2. Muted accounts WILL NOT be allowed to comment…</p>— TaraBull (TaraBull808) August 21, 2023Posted ·
Categories Clips -
Wise Up
$60 billion for Ukraine and $14 billion for Israel. 🇮🇱 🇺🇦 🤔
— Wall Street Silver (@WallStreetSilv) February 8, 2024
But who remembers Maui?
Only received $15 million & still need help… pic.twitter.com/VYbkn1COdAPosted ·
Categories Clips -
Enjoy the Show
Who remembers when Rob. The Whitehouse journalist… His videos prove he is a White House journalist…
— Joe Rambo (@BrainStorm_Joe) October 2, 2023
Gave us this clip of "Joe Biden" the president 😂🤣 carrying his own bags through the airport and then loading into an Uber.
Not a secret Service member in sight.
Seems… https://t.co/c1P5pbDkjW pic.twitter.com/l9ylSRS6aZPosted ·
Categories Clips -
HUMAN EVENTS: 30 MAY - MAGA REMEMBERS